Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Falcon 060 100mhz vs A1200 030 50mhz  (Read 727 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MadshibTopic starter

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: May 2013
  • Posts: 86
    • Show only replies by Madshib
Falcon 060 100mhz vs A1200 030 50mhz
« on: March 07, 2014, 02:29:55 PM »
I saw this come over in an email thread as I am subscribed to the m68k Debian mailing list and thought it was very interesting

https://lists.debian.org/debian-68k/2014/03/msg00001.html

There are clear architecture differences between the platforms, but I though it was worth sharing.
 

Offline Gulliver

Re: Falcon 060 100mhz vs A1200 030 50mhz
« Reply #1 on: March 07, 2014, 02:48:02 PM »
Interesting...
I guess the problem of the poor Falcon performance is the lack of 68k developers for linux that have access to such obscure Falcon hardware.
 

Offline XDelusion

  • Alien Breeder
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 5089
    • Show only replies by XDelusion
    • http://starwarslegacy.net/
Re: Falcon 060 100mhz vs A1200 030 50mhz
« Reply #2 on: March 08, 2014, 12:59:49 AM »
A shame too because those puppies ain't cheap!
Earth has a lot of things other folks might want... like the whole planet. And maybe these folks would like a few changes made, like more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and room for their way of life. - William S. Burroughs
 

Offline MadshibTopic starter

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: May 2013
  • Posts: 86
    • Show only replies by Madshib
Re: Falcon 060 100mhz vs A1200 030 50mhz
« Reply #3 on: March 08, 2014, 02:20:36 AM »
Apparently it is an old discussion around linux and memory management with both platforms. Apparently there is a lack of resource for those that know both the specifics about memory mapping and linux to support the effort of bringing it up to speed.

Still incredible to see a modern OS on such classic hardware. Well, as modern as m68k linux can be that is at this point.