|
Register or have you forgotten your password?
|
|
|
| General chat about Amiga topics This forum is for conversations which are specifically "Amiga" related, but don't fit into other categories. Contents of this forum do appear on the main page, unlike Talk About. If a subject appears to be non-related, it will be moved to Talk About. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | ||||||||
|
Merely Curious
![]()
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 6
|
I have a question that I was wondering if the technical guys on this site might be able to help me understand. Or at least I will give a whole bunch of people on this site something to flame me about. As I see that happens on these forums a lot.
If the WinUAE program supports AGA thru emulation why isn't it possible to write a program or emulator that will run on the current stock of Graphics card for the Amiga that will emulate the AGA chips on an ECS amiga or the new Indivision ECS. Yes obviously the standard unaccelerated Amigas won't be able to handle this but how about the ones that have 060 or PPC accerlators in them. I mean we talk about how the system multitasks well how about a subroutine that redirects the video output to a graphics card or Indivision ECS that will use the same type of emulator that is being used on the UAE system. Has then been tried before? Rattlehead |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |||||||||
|
Too much caffeine
![]()
|
Quote:
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |||||||||
|
Technoid
![]()
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 175
|
Quote:
Emulation can't make old hardware do more then it was originally capable of... Emulation just creates "virtual hardware" using the copious amounts of computing power we have today. I don't think you would have the CPU power on even an '040 for that type of emulation... |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||||||||
|
Premium Member
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||||||||
|
Too much caffeine
![]()
|
For what it's worth, there is a PD program called "Soft AGA" that was distributed by 17-Bit/Quartz PD. It is on disk 4511.
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||||||||
|
' union select name,pwd--
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 6,946
|
That "Soft AGA" is a joke, in case someone didn't get it. The only way to emulate AGA is thru UAE.
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||||||||
|
Cult Member
![]()
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 563
|
I saw in a German magazine "Amiga Magazin" issue 1/97" an expansion to transform an A500 to a fully blown A1200.
It has Kickstart 3.1, AGA Chipset, 68020@14 Mhz processor and a Expansion slot to expand it with faster accelator cards. It called AGAGo. Here you can find a small picture of it: http://www.amiga-magazin.de/magazin/a01-97/messe.html Last edited by amiga1260; 08-30-2009 at 03:56 AM.. |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||||||||
|
Defender of the Faith
![]()
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Malta
Posts: 1,207
|
Sorry to bring up this old thread again.
I'm sure it is not impossible for somebody to create some sort of AGA emulation for ECS machines with say an RTG and a powerful processor like a 50Mhz '030 or an '040. Maybe it could be in the form of a hacked WhdLoad or some sort of patcher program. RTG cards are much much faster then AGA and offer up to 16.7 million colors at much higher resolutions as opposed to the 256 colors that AGA can offer. That coupled with a decent CPU and some fastram and i can't see why it would be doable. Its a bummer having an RTG with its fast blitter (super fast compared to AGA), much more colors and higher resolutions but then being limited to ECS games & demos. Look at SimCity 2000 as an example. The Amiga version will run on an unexpanded A1200 with 2MB chipram but it won't run on say an A3000 with a 68060 processor and Picasso IV.
__________________
A1200HD- Blizzard 1230IV / 64Mb / Kick 3.1 / OS 3.9 / 20GB HD / Indivision A2000 Rev4.4 - Stock (But with ECS chipset) / 1MB Chip mode CD32 - Stock (W/ 2 CD32 Controllers] A500 Plus - 68000 @ 7Mhz / 2MB Chipmem / 2Mb Fast ram / 2.04/Kick1.3 / A590 A600HD - 2MB Chip / 8MB Fast / 2GB CF HD / Kick 3.1 Various Spare A500's and A500 Plus's PowerMac G4 1Ghz (MorphOS / Leopard) http://amigamap.com/user/172 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||||||||||||
|
' union select name,pwd--
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 6,946
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Amiga RTG cards (even Radeon with PCI) aren't much faster than native AGA anyway. The bus solutions are very slow. Quote:
So no, m68k can't do it. Not anywhere near full speed at least. You can see this easily by trying to run UAE (and enabling A1200 kind of configuration) on OCS/ECS machine with a graphics card. It will crawl. It's nowhere near usable speed. Last edited by Piru; 04-10-2012 at 04:29 PM.. |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||||||||
|
Defender of the Faith
![]()
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Malta
Posts: 1,207
|
@Piru
I guess that puts the myth to rest then. The only way for AGA is with a 1200/4000/CD32 or Winuae.
__________________
A1200HD- Blizzard 1230IV / 64Mb / Kick 3.1 / OS 3.9 / 20GB HD / Indivision A2000 Rev4.4 - Stock (But with ECS chipset) / 1MB Chip mode CD32 - Stock (W/ 2 CD32 Controllers] A500 Plus - 68000 @ 7Mhz / 2MB Chipmem / 2Mb Fast ram / 2.04/Kick1.3 / A590 A600HD - 2MB Chip / 8MB Fast / 2GB CF HD / Kick 3.1 Various Spare A500's and A500 Plus's PowerMac G4 1Ghz (MorphOS / Leopard) http://amigamap.com/user/172 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |||||||||
|
' union select name,pwd--
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 6,946
|
Quote:
The closest would probably be A3000 + CS PPC 233 + CyberVisionPPC, running PowerUP MorphOS and PPC native UAE. My guess would be that it'd still struggle to reach usable speeds... and of course it wouldn't be 68k anymore. Last edited by Piru; 04-10-2012 at 04:42 PM.. |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | ||||||||
|
Defender of the Faith
![]()
|
Hi,
Guess that just goes to show, winuae is good for something, but I should know that I use it every day. smerf
__________________
I have no idea what your talking about, so here is a doggy with a small pancake on his head. MorphOS is a MAC done a little better |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | ||||||||
|
Cult Member
![]()
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 961
|
Better idea would be add virtual layer for 68k amigas, so that every nodos game could run in vga screen.
Something like VMware for 68k amigas, migh have performance problems but.. it would be faster than UEA for 68k
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |||||||||
|
' union select name,pwd--
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 6,946
|
Quote:
If not, this is just hot air and wishful thinking. |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | ||||||||
|
Technoid
![]()
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 334
|
haha SoftAGA good joke..
Couldn't find any references on the net.What the?!?!?! seriously VMware for 68k even better joke Poor little machine will have its CPU clock cycles abused crawling to a halt.. Poor Amiga!
Last edited by darkage; 04-11-2012 at 01:12 AM.. Reason: Update. |
||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| aga , question |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|