»

[K7HTH]

Good for you!

[alenppc]

Hahaha!! As if to prove my point, Bell has just announced that starting on the 3rd of December 2006 they are going to introduce a 30 Gig cap for their new subscribers!!

I can't believe they are doing it again! I left them when they introduced a 5 Gig cap, which proved so unpopular they had to lift it after about 7-8 months when they lost hundreds of thousands of customers... and now they're at it again. You just can't believe how greedy that company is!

Anyhow, back to the topic, yes, a router with an integrated DSL modem will work on any computer with minimal maintenance. A simple DSL modem requires the PPPOE login handling by your TCP software, which is a bit more complicated to setup, but is supported by both Miami and Genesis.

Btw, my 68060 A4000 equipped with a mediator PCI is capable of a throughput of over 10 mbits/sec over ethernet when used with the crappy realtek 8139 card (I measured up to 1300 KB/sec).

[Tomas]

That is insane.. I hope you tell Sympatico exactly why you switch. It is idiotic to only support one browser and OS.
Especially now that firefox is so accepted. I cannot believe that anyone besides microsoft would do such a thing.

[Tomas]

Btw, my 68060 A4000 equipped with a mediator PCI is capable of a throughput of over 10 mbits/sec over ethernet when used with the crappy realtek 8139 card (I measured up to 1300 KB/sec).

That is better than my k6 450 debian box using a rtl 8029.

[jjans]

1. Install a router between your ADSL Modem and a Windows machine

2. Use the Windows box (with IE or Firefox) to register the router with your ISP.

3. Connect your Amiga to the router.

If all else fails, I use this solution:

I made my amiga 500 (no ethernet card) a proxy client of my ISA Server (you can use XP and any free proxy app) and connect via null modem cable using MiamiDX.

[alenppc]

Tomas wrote:

That is better than my k6 450 debian box using a rtl 8029.

Yes, but that's because the 8029 is a 10 mbps only chip. The 8139 runs on 100 mbps. The reason why the 8139 is unlikely to go significantly faster lies in the horrible design of the chip.
Its DMA capabilities are useless, the CPU has to do all the work. CPU usage jumps to 100% as soon as you begin transmitting. While that might not be a problem on a 1+ Ghz cpu, 50Mhz are not enough...

[mr_a500]

1. Install a router between your ADSL Modem and a Windows machine

2. Use the Windows box (with IE or Firefox) to register the router with your ISP.

3. Connect your Amiga to the router.

Thanks, but I will NOT EVER use Windows at home. Ever.

[Piru]

@alenppc

The reason why the 8139 is unlikely to go significantly faster lies in the horrible design of the chip.

I don't know where you're getting that. RTL 8139 does better than that, easily.

Its DMA capabilities are useless, the CPU has to do all the work.

This is not true. 8139 does DMA just fine. CPU is not needed to do all the work.

While 060@50 might not be enough to prepare/process the data involved, the problem isn't 8139 itself, since it does DMA just fine.

Some modern cards (typically gigabit or faster) have features that offload some work to the card itself. However, since amiga network stacks have no support for these features, 8139 lacking these features makes no difference at all.

[HopperJF]

Tomas wrote:
That is insane.. I hope you tell Sympatico exactly why you switch. It is idiotic to only support one browser and OS.
Especially now that firefox is so accepted. I cannot believe that anyone besides microsoft would do such a thing.

It probably was Microsoft.

1)Microsoft have meeting with Sympatico
2)Shake hands, business talk
3)Sympatico only endorse Microsoft products

[dkovacs]

Hi;

I have an Amiga 1200 (68030, 64MB ram) and a 3com etherlink ethernet card. I can connect fine with it using Miami and PPPoE, but not through my router (D-Link DI604). My ISP (www.hurontel.on.ca) does not officially support Amiga, any PPPoE connection will work and their homepage comes up fine in AWeb.

I would never use Sympatico/Bell for my ADSL service. If I could switch to a different CLEC for phone service as well I would too.

Capping a user's bandwidth is unethical because if a customer has a virus (on a windows box) they could easily blow through most of their transfer limit in a very short amount of time.

How are other people here finding ADSL service with their amiga? Anyone using an ADSL service that supports DHCP? Anyone here getting broadband in Canada from a CLEC?

Dan

[dkovacs]

aardvark wrote:

Rogers, Shaw or whatever cable company you have in your area that offers hi- speed internet. As DSL requires you to be close to the exchange, I assume you're in a major urban are, so cable should be available to you. If not and you have to use the phone lines, Primus or Telus may be able to help.

If you live in an area in Canada who is not serviced by bell for phone service you may be able to get DSL anywhere in their service area. There are new technologies that allow DSL to be provided over very long cable loops, some even bring ethernet directly into the home.

Dan

[ssolie]

@mr_a500
The only incompatibilities I've run into are web browser related and Ethernet related.

Some ISPs require you to administer your account via the web and that means Internet Exploiter most of the time. I've had good luck with Firefox as well but usually they push IE on you.

The Ethernet problem I've run into is with the old ASDG LANRover card. It is so old it uses an ancient Ethernet protocol which I know is not supported by Shaw's cable modems (Motorola). I upgraded to a X-Surf and of course had no problems since.

I've run ISDN, DSL and cable with my A3000D via an Ethernet interface for years now.

[mr_a500]

I have an Amiga 1200 (68030, 64MB ram) and a 3com etherlink ethernet card. I can connect fine with it using Miami and PPPoE, but not through my router (D-Link DI604). My ISP (www.hurontel.on.ca) does not officially support Amiga, any PPPoE connection will work and their homepage comes up fine in AWeb.

Hi Dan. So you finally got that A1200 online, eh? (last time I remember you had to transfer files by floppy) I checked out Hurontel and it looks OK except for the fact that they force you to use their modem: "*High Speed DSL/DSL Basic require $5.00 monthly modem rental fee".
Are you using their modem or did you find a way to avoid that?

ssolie wrote:
The Ethernet problem I've run into is with the old ASDG LANRover card. It is so old it uses an ancient Ethernet protocol which I know is not supported by Shaw's cable modems (Motorola).

Hi Steven. Good to see you here. Thanks again for that AMUC stuff. :-)

I was thinking about using this card in an A1200. This isn't the card you're talking about, with the "ancient Ethernet protocol" is it?

[amigakit]

The card you referenced works fine with Wireless Routers and comes with EasyNet software - we have already added quite a few Presets for US ISPs - but would be happy to add Canadian ISPs to make it easier to connect to the net.

[alenppc]

Piru wrote:

I don't know where you're getting that. RTL 8139 does better than that, easily.

Ever glanced at the comments of FreeBSD kernel sources?

* The RealTek 8139 PCI NIC redefines the meaning of 'low end.' This is
* probably the worst PCI ethernet controller ever made, with the possible
* exception of the FEAST chip made by SMC. The 8139 supports bus-master
* DMA, but it has a terrible interface that nullifies any performance
* gains that bus-master DMA usually offers.
*
* For transmission, the chip offers a series of four TX descriptor
* registers. Each transmit frame must be in a contiguous buffer, aligned
* on a longword (32-bit) boundary. This means we almost always have to
* do mbuf copies in order to transmit a frame, except in the unlikely
* case where a) the packet fits into a single mbuf, and b) the packet
* is 32-bit aligned within the mbuf's data area. The presence of only
* four descriptor registers means that we can never have more than four
* packets queued for transmission at any one time.
*
* Reception is not much better. The driver has to allocate a single large
* buffer area (up to 64K in size) into which the chip will DMA received
* frames. Because we don't know where within this region received packets
* will begin or end, we have no choice but to copy data from the buffer
* area into mbufs in order to pass the packets up to the higher protocol
* levels.
*
* It's impossible given this rotten design to really achieve decent
* performance at 100Mbps, unless you happen to have a 400Mhz PII or
* some equally overmuscled CPU to drive it.

While elbox's drivers have been optimized (when used on 060/50, the card in fact easily outperforms a Win98 P133 machine) this is still far from an ideal solution.