Hi everyone,

I've got a problem with the information on the Big Book of Amiga hardware about the Amiga custom chip revisions. At best it's sketchy, at worse it's just plain wrong.

The "regular" table about Agnuses (Agni?) is here:

http://www.amiga-hardware.com/showhardware.cgi?HARDID=1448

Agnus (512K) 8361 252125-01 A1000 (NTSC), A2000A (NTSC)
Agnus (512K) 8361 R3
Agnus (512K) 8367 252362-01 A1000 (PAL), A2000A (PAL)
Agnus (512K) 8370 318070-01 A500 (NTSC), A2000 (NTSC)
Agnus (512K) 8371 318071-01 A500 (PAL), A2000 (PAL)
Agnus (1 MB) 8372 318069-02 A500 (PAL), A2000 (PAL) Regular Type
Agnus (1 MB) 8372A 318069-029 A500 (PAL), A2000 (PAL) (changed after some damage)
Agnus (2 MB) 8372AB 318069-03 A3000 (PAL), A3000T (PAL) (came after 8375B)
Agnus (2 MB) 8372B
Agnus (2 MB) 8375 R0   318069-18 A500+ (PAL), A600 (PAL)
Agnus (1 MB) 8375VBB / 8375 R1 318069-16 A500 (PAL), A2000 (PAL)
Agnus (2 MB) 8375 R2   318069-10 A500+ (PAL), A600 (PAL)
Agnus (2 MB) 8375 318069-11
Agnus (1 MB) 8375 318069-17 A500 (NTSC), A2000 (NTSC)
Agnus (2 MB) 8375 318069-19 A3000 (NTSC), A3000T (NTSC)
Agnus (2 MB) 8375 390544-01 A500+ (PAL), A600 (PAL)
Agnus (2 MB) 8375 390544-02 A500+ (NTSC), A600 (NTSC)


I have some problems with this table:


################################################################

> Agnus (2 MB) 8372AB 318069-03 A3000 (PAL), A3000T (PAL)(came after 8375B)[/i]

1) There is NO 8375B in the table (and there should there be!)

2) Look at the date codes on the three chips with the same number (318069-03)

8372AB 318069-03 = 4589, 5089, 5289 = 1989
8372B 318069-03 = 3591, 3791 = 1991
8375B 318069-03 = 5292 = 1992

8372AB
http://www.amiga-hardware.com/download_photos/a3000rev70.jpg
http://www.amiga-hardware.com/download_photos/megachip2000_1_big.jpg
http://www.amiga-hardware.com/download_photos/a3000rev61mb_1_big.jpg

8372B
http://www.amiga-hardware.com/download_photos/a3000rev9_big.jpg

8375B
http://www.amiga-hardware.com/download_photos/achipabig.jpg

In my mind that means that 8372AB came first, then 8372B and then 8375B, correct?

An EAB webmaster has said that their 8372B 318069-03 (3791) came from an A3000D. Anyone else? This variant is missing a description.

What the crap is commodore doing having 3 chips with the same code, were they bonded out differently with the same silicon inside? Did they do different things?


############################################################

> Agnus (2 MB) 8375 318069-11[/i]

This has no description. I know myself that this is an NTSC variant used in the A500+ / A600. I have one myself in a DKB Megachip I stoopidly ordered from the US before I knew there were NTSC and PAL Agni

Here is some confirmation, an A600 with one 8375 318069-11 (4592) = 1992

http://www.amiga-hardware.com/download_photos/a600mbrev2b_1.jpg

############################################################

> Agnus (2 MB) 8375 R2 318069-10 A500+ (PAL), A600 (PAL)

There is no R2 silked on a 318060-10 Agnus, and hence having it in the table is meaningless.

8375 318069-10 = 0992, 4292, 4792, 4992 = 1992

http://www.amiga-hardware.com/download_photos/achipa_1_big.jpg
http://www.amiga-hardware.com/download_photos/a500plusrev8amb.jpg
http://www.amiga-hardware.com/download_photos/minimegichip_1_big.jpg
http://www.amiga-hardware.com/download_photos/a600mbrev13.jpg

It is the later version of the 8375, but I plan to get some date codes in the table to make that obvious.

Does anyone have this version with an R2 on it??

############################################################

AFAIK VBB is not part of the chip designation.[/i]

There are other chips with VBB on them. I am almost sure (but need confirmation) that it is something to do with the processing. Anyone confirm this?

I've only got one photo of this part 318069-16 and so I cannot deny 100% that it never had R1 on it... anyone?

As you can see with a datecode of 1493 = 1993 this is a later agnus than the one in the table marked R2!! This makes much more sense as it has a later revision number.

Anyone any idea why this is marked as a 1Mbyte Agnus??

http://eab.abime.net/attachment.php?attachmentid=10266&d=1140039662

############################################################

> Agnus (2 MB) 8375 R0 318069-18 A500+ (PAL), A600 (PAL)[/i]


There is definately Agnus chips silked 8375R0, but the only picture I've been able to find is of the 390544-01

http://www.amiga-hardware.com/download_photos/3statechip2mb_1_big.jpg

As both these chips are designated PAL I think there has been a mixup, but more information is required to be 100% sure.

A date code of 0392 = 1992 is not consistant. There are earlier versions of the 390544-01 8375 WITHOUT the R0 dated 3591, 4291, 4391, 5291 = 1991. Need some more pictures of R0's to be sure!

http://www.amiga-hardware.com/download_photos/megichip_1_big.jpg
http://www.amiga-hardware.com/download_photos/a500_68010_big.jpg
http://www.amiga-hardware.com/download_photos/a600mbrev1_big.jpg

Hmm, I would assume that they introduced the R0 silk on later chips because they ran two lines? There are some 8375 318069-10 dated 0992 which is only 6 weeks different.

Can ANYONE provide a shot of a 318069-18? To be doubly sure?

############################################################

Does anyone know if there were A3000 specific Agnus's? This table shows that certain ones were ONLY in A3000's. I think we've dispelled that myth as some are on MegaChip type adapters, but does anyone know for sure?

############################################################

If everyone who knows about Amiga's can come together now with hard information, we can clear up this grey spot for good.

Anyone got any serious info to input. I know that it doesnt really affect most Amiga users, their agnus is what they got and they really dont care, but to strange screwed up individuals like myself, trying to add 2Mbyte chip RAM to older Amiga's and CDTV's, information like this is priceless. Finding out that it's all wrong is maddening!

Someone once wrote: "Before re-using someone elses wheel, always check that it is round."

On the internet, No-one seems to care for this saying and certain areas of Amiga hardware documentation are WRONG and have been copied and used as if it were correct all over the net

Finding the REAL information is very difficult :madashell:

http://obligement.free.fr/articles/chipsetamiga.php

This is a subset of the same info as contained within The big book of Amiga hardware but in a different format. It contains information that I've already set out to prove is wrong or partially wrong.

8375VBB[/i] - VBB is not a version code. It's some process code.
8375R0 318069-18[/i] - All the 8375R0 photo's I can find are marked 390544-01.

I dont really need links to other websites as they all seem to have copied one another. (unless you are sure they contain really good / different info)

I need some more empirical information, either first hand numbers off your AGNUS, information off one of the engineers who worked on these chips, links to photographs of agnuses not on the http://www.Amiga-Hardware.com website or http://amiga.resource.cx

Everything appreciated. Lets get our holy grail of Amiga hardware (Big book of Amiga hardware) upto date and correct.

Ian chapman, owner of "The big book of Amiga Hardware" website has endorsed my work to bring this information accurately up-to-date. Get reading and submitting the codes off the top of your Agnuses to this thread.

There is an Agnus in every OCS/ECS amiga.

I need the full text printed on top of the chip so I can work out dates of manufacture. Also say which computer it came from (A1000, A500, A500+, A600, A1500, A2000, B2000, A3000, CDTV)

If you also want to check your Denise at the same time

A3000 PAL, rev 9 motherboard:
318069-03
8372B
3791-23

A500 PAL, rev 6a motherboard:
318069-02
8372A
2089-23

other systems info to be added later

Great work... keep em comming. The date codes are really usefull in working out a timeline for these beasts.

We really need more info on the -16 Agnuses and above.

I think that VBB refers to the fact that these chips can take a reference voltage to determine the voltage difference between a digital high '1' and low '0' perhaps to enable them to connect to chips which have different I/O (ECL, TTL, CMOS). Beside the point, VBB isnt anything to do with the version of chip as you concur.

maybe Vbb is for 5V and indicates its not 3.3v cmos chip, dunno

i will try to look at my 3000 machines.


all we need 100% correct&confirmed agnus list  8-)