|
Register or have you forgotten your password?
|
|
|
| Other Operating Systems This forum is to allow our members to discuss other (non-Amiga-related) operating systems. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | ||||||||
|
Technoid
![]()
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 323
|
Hi there,
I was googling for other fpga implementations of the true home desktop computers (those in the 80's mainly) and I found about Project Suska (http://experiment-s.de/en/). The man seems to be selling a 100% reimplementation of an Atari ST(E) and even Falcon computer, wich is tempting as hell. I'd have got one without thinking. But... Look at the price, for God's ****! 600 Euros?? That's insane. So, is this a typo? Someone here got one of these Suskas? Is the price somehow justified? (Not getting one at that price anyway, just out of curiosity). |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||||||||
|
sad moaning faced git
|
Sounds a whole lot like the Natami thing. Would your feelings be the same if the Natami were 600 euros?
__________________
3 Commodore file cabinets, 2 Commodore USB turntables, 1 AmigaWorld beer mug Alienware M14x i7 laptop running AmigaForever |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |||||||||
|
Technoid
![]()
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 323
|
Quote:
But I don't quite see your point: it seems limited to Atari ST & Falcon to me. It doesn't seem any faster or usable: the Natami idea was to take the old Amiga desing and make it as fast as possible while keeping compatibility with old software to a degree. On the other hand, this Suska thing seems to be an Atari ST or Falcon at best (now that's not bad at all, but it's not the same as the Natami idea, by no means). Correct me if I'm wrong... |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |||||||||
|
Cult Member
![]()
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 792
|
Quote:
What is more cool is the VHDL is open-sourced. Port it to FPGA-Arcade...
__________________
Bill T All Glory to the Hypnotoad! |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||||||||
|
Technoid
![]()
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 320
|
If you consider manufacturing, development time and the amount of people who would actually be interested in this if it even cost a fraction of that price, I don't think it's entirely unreasonable.
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||||||||
|
Cult Member
![]()
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 834
|
People tend to blow off how much low quantity electronics cost to produce, but it really is outrageous.
If you only have moderately good relationships with a company, more than 4 layers to the board and only do small numbers, it will cost you a ton of money. You also have to pay for the prototypes you wasted getting the design nailed down. Those boards in quantity 25 or less can cost a ton each and be completely useless. I'm really impressed with how low the price on the replay board is, he's clearly got good funding and relationships with the manufacturer. (now if they'd ever be available for sale!!!) |
||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| price , suska , whta , wrong |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|