|
Register or have you forgotten your password?
|
|
|
| General chat about Amiga topics This forum is for conversations which are specifically "Amiga" related, but don't fit into other categories. Contents of this forum do appear on the main page, unlike Talk About. If a subject appears to be non-related, it will be moved to Talk About. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 | ||||||||
|
Desperately needs a life
![]()
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Nevada, USA
Posts: 3,450
|
The Warp Engine was the best '040 accelerator made. Phase5 didn't catch up with (and surpass) the design until the MK3 Cyberstorm was released 4 years later. Compared to the MK2 Cyberstorm, you have onboard SCSI-2 and much faster memory performance. The only advantage of the MK2 '040 is that it was upgradable to '060.
The GVP cards were great too, though the '040 version took the proprietary SIMMs and SCSI was an option. The T-Rex II was only available in '060 form AFAIK (and was a great card - wish I could find one to replace my MK2 Cyberstorm!). Last edited by Damion; 08-09-2012 at 12:32 PM.. |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | ||||||||
|
Too much caffeine
![]()
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 95
|
Might I suggest going for an 060 card if you can afford? It is _much_ cooler running than an 040 which always comes with a heatsink (or fan?).
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | ||||||||
|
Cult Member
![]()
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | ||||||||
|
Desperately needs a life
![]()
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Delaware
Posts: 3,090
|
How fast?
Comparable to a simalarly clocked '060. And usually available at a better price.
__________________
Power mac FW800 MDD with dual 1.33 GHz Xserve processors , 1.5 GB memory, Radeon 9800XT video card, SoundBlaster Live card, and an NEC USB 2.0 card running MorphOS 3.2 and OSX And, now, a Powerbook G4 15" 1.67 Ghz notebook with MorphOS 3.1 (still under construction). Just bought 1.42 GHz iBook as substitute for above. BTW - I still have an old A2000 for the days I'm into pain. "MorphOS isn't Amiga, its better" Whiskey woman don't you know that you are driving me insane? |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |||||||||
|
Technoid
![]()
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 363
|
Quote:
You can often find much better deals on forums but be careful to check a bit on the seller. If it's someone with only a couple of posts, it's risky. If it's an established member with years of posting, usually good. I got my Cyberstorm PPC from a private contact--another old Amigan--who did a lot of serious work with Amigas back in the day. The price was much less than what I would have paid on eBay.
__________________
A2500 owned since 1993 with A2630/DKB 2632, DKB Megachip, GVP EGS Spectrum, A2320 and GVP HC+8 on the inside and a DCTV on the outside. A4000D with CSPPC, Cybervision 64 and a Flicker Magic flicker fixer. A4000T Toaster Flyer & CSMKII. All systems completly retro and classic and mostly used to do geometic art as in my avatar. |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | ||||||||
|
Technoid
![]()
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 280
|
some ppl said here that the 030 is twice faster per clock but it is not true
the 040 is 4 times faster than the 030 or the 020 at idem clock ie sysinfo on a 030/25 reports 4.x mips the 040/25 reports 18.x mips the 040 and the 060 are idem core and will work at idem speed per clock ex a 040/50mhz is fast like a 060/50mhz Last edited by LaserBack; 08-09-2012 at 10:39 PM.. |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | ||||||||
|
Kindred of Babble-on
![]()
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: finland
Posts: 2,144
|
Huh huh..
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | ||||||||
|
Kindred of Babble-on
![]()
|
@LaserBack
Don't mistake benchmark figures for real world performance. Most benchmarks use small(ish) loops which favor caches. ALU performance is about 2x, FPU is a lot faster. |
||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| 040 , cpu , fast |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|