|
Register or have you forgotten your password?
|
|
|
| General chat about Amiga topics This forum is for conversations which are specifically "Amiga" related, but don't fit into other categories. Contents of this forum do appear on the main page, unlike Talk About. If a subject appears to be non-related, it will be moved to Talk About. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | ||||||||
|
Technoid
![]()
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: sydney australia
Posts: 181
|
i know im gonna get told too old or slow ..but i have often wondered ..esp with the natami when it was coming ..then it went quiet ..an all the work thats been done with it re: new type graphics chipset ..faster cpu etc ..why noone has considered re doin the schematics on the AAA chipset board that was almost finished ..my understanding of it was it could be made to run with more than one aaa chipset running ..as in parrallel 2/3 chipsets ..surely with a 060 with it it would be fast enough to browse online play games etc ..i realize it doesnt compare to a ppc but that never really took off that big ..an interest in the natami an others was growing leaps an bounds ..i would probably buy one still ..if it ever comes out ..seems to me that a upgraded board that was almost finished would be a better starting point ..than basically starting with a 1200 an trying to turn it into a super computer ..
my opinion .....an thoughts..
__________________
A500 3.1/8meg/2gigscsi ...wants a 040 CD32/SX1/FMV/FLASHDRIVE/ wants sx32pro A1200 os3.5 030/50/fpu/mmu/2flashdrives/cd/ indivision coming ..............wants a ppc/060 ACCEL
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||||||||
|
Master Sock Abuser
|
The AAA chipset was old even by the time Dave manged to get some working silicon. By that point the commodore engineers were playin catchup to the dedicated graphics chip manufacturers
__________________
My iPhone Game: Puny Humans - http://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/puny-...362230281?mt=8 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||||||||
|
Cult Member
![]()
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Kansas
Posts: 739
|
The AAA would provide reasonably good performance using todays technology but there are parts that are outdated and parts that are missing compared to what is expected today. It's much cheaper to work in an fpga than to create a custom chip too. The Natami route is the proper way to do a modern AGA/AAA. The Natami is not quite AAA but it is a much more flexible and compatible way of seeing what a more modern Amiga could do. AAA would have been a compatibility nightmare for those that liked their old hardware banging games.
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||||||||
|
Desperately needs a life
![]()
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Delaware
Posts: 3,073
|
Both really good answers.
For backward compatibility and BETTER then AAA performance, a clean slate would be best.
__________________
Epic fail on donation - guess I will have to look for a good cause - Power mac FW800 MDD with dual 1.33 GHz Xserve processors , 1.5 GB memory, Radeon 9800XT video card, SoundBlaster Live card, and an NEC USB 2.0 card running MorphOS 3.1 and OSX And, now, a Powerbook G4 15" 1.67 Ghz notebook with MorphOS 3.1 (still under construction). "MorphOS isn't Amiga, its better" Whiskey woman don't you know that you are driving me insane? |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||||||||
|
Defender of the Faith
![]()
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,045
|
Quote:
if we were talking about tooling up to make a recognisable completed single machine prototype like a Commodore 65...... |
|||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| aaa , chipset , question |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|