|
Register or have you forgotten your password?
|
|
|
| General chat about Amiga topics This forum is for conversations which are specifically "Amiga" related, but don't fit into other categories. Contents of this forum do appear on the main page, unlike Talk About. If a subject appears to be non-related, it will be moved to Talk About. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 | ||||||||
|
Premium Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 461
|
Yes, I normally use WinUAE to run them, I imagine they would be too slow otherwise...
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | ||||||||
|
Defender of the Faith
![]()
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,131
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | ||||||||
|
Too much caffeine
![]()
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 92
|
Not the 060 side of the accelerator, but I remember being able to run everything up to maybe Atari System I (Marble Madness, etc) on the Blizzard PPC/240. I would have to reduce fullscreen colors to 32 or 64 to get it playable though. Tried the 060 version, but was unable to get anything but pacman and the like to run at speed.
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | ||||||||
|
Premium Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,100
|
I got my A4000 working.
![]() I just tried Ghouls'n'Ghosts on my CS-PPC. It was quite interesting... OS3.9 AGA: 31% speed OS3.9 Voodoo III (Prometheus): 30% speed (this should not be slower!) OS4.0 Voodoo III (Prometheus): 35% speed! First off, there's no way AGA should be faster, even if only 1%. Something's a bit squiffy there. To back up the "something squiffy" theory, it's crazy that it's faster in OS4. The 68K emulation is very good, even in OS 4.0, but 18% faster than a 68060?! My CSPPC is a 604e@200,68060@50, by the way.
__________________
-- Ian Gledhill ian.gledhill@btinternit.com (except it should be internEt of course...!) Check out my shop! http://www.mutant-caterpillar.co.uk/shop/ - for 8-bit (and soon 16-bit) goodness! |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | ||||||||
|
Technoid
![]()
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 214
|
Well, if Petunia on a 604@200MHz is only 18% faster than a 060, it's rather disappointing, actually
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | ||||||||
|
Too much caffeine
![]()
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nottingham, England
Posts: 89
|
I bet the Prometheus isn`t doing DMA - there`s a thread or two about it somewhere. Something about a firmware update.
__________________
-insert clever profundity here- |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | ||||||||
|
Kindred of Babble-on
![]()
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: finland
Posts: 2,127
|
It never did without update.
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | ||||||||
|
Premium Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,100
|
DMA is something different, it doesn't affect the speed of software like this.
As for it being 18% faster, that's really quite surprising. I know on the face of it it may seem like Petunia should be much faster, but remember the 604e is only 4x the clock speed of the 68060, which is also equipped with some quite fancy speed-up things like caches and stuff. Also remember that the 604e may run at 200MHz but the memory bus definitely doesn't, and in fact the 604e spends quite a bit of time throttled by the lack of L2 cache. Either way, I'd say it shows that Petunia really is a pretty fine CPU emulation.
__________________
-- Ian Gledhill ian.gledhill@btinternit.com (except it should be internEt of course...!) Check out my shop! http://www.mutant-caterpillar.co.uk/shop/ - for 8-bit (and soon 16-bit) goodness! |
||||||||
|
|
|