|
Register or have you forgotten your password?
|
|
|
| General chat about Amiga topics This forum is for conversations which are specifically "Amiga" related, but don't fit into other categories. Contents of this forum do appear on the main page, unlike Talk About. If a subject appears to be non-related, it will be moved to Talk About. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | ||||||||
|
Cult Member
![]()
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 696
|
I know someone who is offering me an Amiga 4000 toaster or an Amiga 1200 expanded to tower with all the cool expansion gadgets and toys for the Amiga 1200 (it is towered to be an Amiga 4000) for free he is giving it to me for free in exchange I sell LOTS AND LOTS and lots of Amiga hardware for him. So the question to you guys, what is the best choice for me? An Amiga 1200 towered or an Amiga 4000 with toaster? Thanks in advance.
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||||||||
|
Defender of the Faith
![]()
|
Depends whats in them and what you want to do wth them. Video Toaster is now little more than an interesting curiousity, so pretty much worthless minus novelty factor.
Id base my decision on specs, of which youve provided none
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||||||||
|
Kindred of Babble-on
![]()
|
I'm still new to the AGA machines, but as far as I've seen the 1200 is the Amiga with the most support these days, I'd probably go for that.
__________________
Amiga 1200 (KS3.1/ClassicWB3.1, 4GB HD, 34MB RAM, 68030 @ 50MHz) DEC VAXStation 4000/60 (OpenVMS 7.3, 9GB HD, 104MB RAM, KA46 @ 55MHz) DEC MicroPDP-11/73 (RT-11, 32MB HD, 4MB RAM, KDJ11 @ 15MHz) "'Legacy code' often differs from its suggested alternative by actually working and scaling." - Bjarne Stroustrup |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||||||||
|
Merely Curious
![]()
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 10
|
If it was an Amiga 4000 Tower, Commordore, not Escom, I'd do that.
This case I'd do the A1200 as that is one of the more common systems and hence you can find alot more support and goodies for it. Just my 2cents though. |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||||||||
|
Cult Member
![]()
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 696
|
So be it then. I have an Amiga 500 with external hard drive, should I sell my Amiga 500 in replace for a towered Amiga 120...damn I cannot finish this sentence!! Pfft duh!!!
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||||||||
|
Cult Member
![]()
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 943
|
If a4000 would have 060 accelerator, I'd take it as those are too expensive and rare to get otherwise. But in other cases A1200 is easier and cheaper to expand...
__________________
Best viewed with http://aoproxy.extropia.co.uk/ and IBrowse! :-) |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||||||||
|
Premium Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,100
|
A4000 every time for me.
1200s need a lot of hackery to get up to maxed-out 4000 speed, and stability on heavily notified systems is difficult to maintain. On the 4000 you just need a PCI bus and a CS-PPC and you have the best classic you can get.
__________________
-- Ian Gledhill ian.gledhill@btinternit.com (except it should be internEt of course...!) Check out my shop! http://www.mutant-caterpillar.co.uk/shop/ - for 8-bit (and soon 16-bit) goodness! |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||||||||
|
Premium Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 305
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |||||||||
|
Defender of the Faith
![]()
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,131
|
Quote:
The only new hardware for the a1200 is the 030 cards, which aren't that exciting. I'd probably go for the a4000 if it had an 040 or 060. The only thing that would sway me is if the a1200 had a PPC+graphics cards and the a4000 didn't. |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |||||||||
|
Premium Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 305
|
Quote:
Amiga technologies: http://www.amigahistory.co.uk/a40t.jpg Commodore: http://www.amigahistory.co.uk/a4000t_big.jpg |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |||||||||
|
sad moaning faced git
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() Sure, it might still be worth getting some case fronts molded up, but it's not as easy as just changing a label. As for the OP's question, I'd tend to lean towards the A1200, especially if you don't get to look at the A4000's board for battery damage first. edit: yeah, what danwood said, though the case metal was the same (both made by Enlight.)
__________________
3 Commodore file cabinets, 2 Commodore USB turntables, 1 AmigaWorld beer mug Alienware M14x i7 laptop running AmigaForever |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |||||||||
|
Defender of the Faith
![]()
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,266
|
Quote:
I would look at the specs of both systems before making a decision. - CPU (Accelerator boards, stock CPU) - Condition, Damage due to battery leak(4000), etc. - Bussboards(PCI or whatever strange thing might be in a 1200) - Graphics cards - Other Expansions such as USB Also look at quality of tower conversion. I have seen some strange stuff from 6 foot tall (1.8288 meters for you metric nuts) 4000s and some really hacky shoehorning of poor little A1200 motherboards into PC cases. Now, this is a towered A1200 so if both systems are pretty equivalent then I would take the 4000. A1200s are designed to be desktop computers. |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | ||||||||
|
Defender of the Faith
![]()
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,266
|
You can get relatively cheap 030 boards and a subway USB, but I don't see this plethora of A1200 hardware you speak of...
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | ||||||||
|
Cult Member
![]()
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 696
|
What I will do then is simple. I will wait next week when I receive closet worth of Amiga hardware and the Amiga systems. I will boot both Amiga 4000 and Amiga 1200 and see the specs of them both. I will dissect them both to core in terms of specs then I will post the specs here. I will wait for pages worth of response, and count how many votes for the A1200 based on the specs I posted here and how many votes for the A4000. If the A4000 votes are more than the A1200 I will take the A4000, if in the other hand it is the other way around, then I will take the A1200. Personally I would take them both but the guy said either or OR. So I am forced to decide and I do not mind picking the Amiga based on the votes picked here because I LOVE THEM EQUALLY both...so I am happy with whatever decisions you GUYS make here.
I would simply rely on the fact the most votes counted here is for my extreme benefit and that when I pick the Amiga based on the votes you guys placed here, it will be the best choice I made. Oh: I will also point out if the Amiga 4000 is EVEN tower from the first place. |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | ||||||||
|
Kindred of Babble-on
![]()
|
Getting them and checking them out before deciding is a good idea, but don't put it to a poll. Take everyone's advice into consideration, but go with what you want, you'll be much happier that way.
__________________
Amiga 1200 (KS3.1/ClassicWB3.1, 4GB HD, 34MB RAM, 68030 @ 50MHz) DEC VAXStation 4000/60 (OpenVMS 7.3, 9GB HD, 104MB RAM, KA46 @ 55MHz) DEC MicroPDP-11/73 (RT-11, 32MB HD, 4MB RAM, KDJ11 @ 15MHz) "'Legacy code' often differs from its suggested alternative by actually working and scaling." - Bjarne Stroustrup |
||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| 4000 , a1200 , amiga , offered |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|