amiga.org
     
iconAll times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:47 PM. | Welcome to Forum, please register to access all of our features.

» Amiga.org » Operating System Specific Discussions » Amiga OS » Amiga OS -- Application questions and support » The Workbench 3.1 natural successor?

Amiga OS -- Application questions and support Having problems with a specific software application for AmigaOS? This is the place to ask

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-26-2010, 12:34 PM   #31
Hell Labs
Banned
Points: 597, Level: 11 Points: 597, Level: 11 Points: 597, Level: 11
Activity: 68% Activity: 68% Activity: 68%
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: St.Helens, oop north, England
Posts: 490
Default Re: The Workbench 3.1 natural successor?

I already said "The exception to that is Cwb because that was made by someone you could describe as "sane"."

So really, you're preaching to the converted. and I've seen a thread where somebody ran amikit on an 060 and it was balls slow, i'm talking whoops-windows-xp-sp3-on-pentium-133mhz-64mb slow.

Can amiga in a box even be downloaded any more? last I tried it was gone.
Hell Labs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2010, 04:13 AM   #32
Dandy
Cult Member
Points: 9,284, Level: 64 Points: 9,284, Level: 64 Points: 9,284, Level: 64
Activity: 1% Activity: 1% Activity: 1%
 
Dandy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Cologne - Germany
Posts: 909
Default Re: The Workbench 3.1 natural successor?

Quote:
Originally Posted by save2600 View Post

OS3.9 is really nice - but in my experience and usage, I do not like running it on anything less than an 040. It felt pretty slow on my 40mhz 030 equipped A1200 when I had it and I recently installed 3.9 on my 25mhz A3000 - to which I quickly un-installed it and went back to 3.1.
...
Hmmmm - I mainly use OS 3.9 on my A4000PPC. On the 68060@50mHz the speed is quite acceptable, but this may be due to the fact that my harddrives are attached to the UW-SCSI host adapter.

Initially I had an HD attached to internal IDE and that way the system was not so responsive. So I switched to SCSI and disabled the IDE...

I also have an 40mhz 030 equipped A1200 with OS 3.9., but haven't used it for years. I can remember that it was of course slower than the A4k, but I would think dropping the IDE in favour of an SCSI host would most likely speed up the system equally.
__________________
Dandy
My Website
If someone enjoys marching to military music, then I already despise him. He got his brain accidently - the bone marrow in his back would have been sufficiant for him! (Albert Einstein)
Dandy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2010, 05:28 AM   #33
sim085
Cult Member
Points: 11,271, Level: 70 Points: 11,271, Level: 70 Points: 11,271, Level: 70
Activity: 1% Activity: 1% Activity: 1%
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Malta (Europe)
Posts: 915
Blog Entries: 1
Default Re: The Workbench 3.1 natural successor?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hell Labs View Post
>aminet-install netsurf
I actually would love that idea!! wonder if it is possible to have sometime in the future. The only problem that I can see is that many of the install scripts would need to change. At least in order to be able to un-install what has been installed.

Last edited by sim085; 05-19-2010 at 05:37 AM..
sim085 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
natural , successor , workbench

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump