»

[Heiroglyph]

I skipped over Amithons heyday and got into it later, but I'm very interested in it.

Would you still use something similar?

What would a modern version need to change?

[trekiej]

I do not think it is as necessary as it was before.
I do not know if I would use it or not.
I am writing this from Icaros Desktop 1.3.
I would be currios to see how it performed, etc.

[commodorejohn]

Enlighten me, as I wasn't part of the community for its heyday and can't find a lot of description on just what the heck it is. As near as I can make out, it's an x86-based Amiga emulator that runs on bare metal, rather than inside an OS?

Assuming this is correct: I don't really see why I'd want this. The numbers I've found seem impressive (450MHz 040 on a 1GHz x86? Nice.) But removing it from the context of a host operating system seems to lose the main advantage of an emulator (easily installed and operated side-by-side with a modern operating system) without approaching the coolness factor of custom hardware.

(Also, it sounds like it doesn't support the chipset? That's...pretty weak, really. But that may be old information - like I said, Google isn't telling me a lot.)

[Franko]

@ CommodoreJohn

There was some stuff about it in the old magazines before they all disappeared at the start of the century, it was basically just another emulator to run on x86 hardware but if I recall correctly at the time the prices you'd have to pay to get all the kit together and up and running put it into the world of La, La Land...

Don't even think it could handle the custom chipset emulation very well so almost all games & demos were a no go on it. Always seemed to me from what I read about it, a pretty pointless exercise to tell the truth...

[Heiroglyph]

Basically it has a minimal Linux underneath that exposed the PCI bus and many devices to the AmigaOS as real hardware.

You had as direct as possible access to the hardware so it acted much like a Draco in that you could only run OS legal applications with Picasso96, no hardware banging, although at least the CIA's were there.

I'm not sure that the chipset emulation would slow it down by much on todays PC's, but that was some of the justification.

You could also mix and match x86 libraries and executables. For example you could use an x86 native datatype and 68k apps would benefit from them.

Part of the idea was to slowly move more and more of the OS to x86 without having to do it all at once. It also made more hardware available, giving a huge speed boost, more RAM, RTG, AHI and network card at very little cost.

At the time it seemed to be a great option, but the licensing wasn't done properly so it was killed in court.

[Franko]

Originally Posted by Heiroglyph

I skipped over Amithons heyday and got into it later, but I'm very interested in it.

Would you still use something similar?

What would a modern version need to change?

In answer to your questions, I can only say this...

Would you still use something similar... No, simply because I don't see these "alternative" OS's on x86 hardware or whatever being anything to do with the real Amiga experience...

To me if I really wanted to run modern day software then I could just buy such software for my iMacs or buy a PC, either way it would be a lot cheaper than paying for a custom made Amiga like OS and hardware that will most likely not match the equivalent of a modern day PC...

As to "What would a modern version need to change?"... again I just don't see why folk would want an Amiga on x86 hardware with all the problems & flaws it would involve and never achieving anywhere close to being like using a real Amiga...

The NatAmi with it's extra ports & gfx modes to me is the only real hope we have of ever achieving an Amiga that new stuff can be written for, to bring it that bit closer to "modern day computing" while being the most backward compatible system possible at the same time...

[XDelusion]

The last time I ran Amithlon, it ran circles around any emulator on the same hardware. I loved it!

[Franko]

Originally Posted by XDelusion

The last time I ran Amithlon, it ran circles around any emulator on the same hardware. I loved it!

But what did it emulate if it couldn't handle the custom chipsets properly...

[XDelusion]

A **** load! Pretty much anything AHI and RTG friendly. Quake for instance absolutely flew on my old Amithlon machine. And considering that there are unofficial updates for it, I have considered building another machine just for it until AROS gets its ass out of the Alpha stage.

[Franko]

Originally Posted by XDelusion

A **** load! Pretty much anything AHI and RTG friendly. Quake for instance absolutely flew on my old Amithlon machine. And considering that there are unofficial updates for it, I have considered building another machine just for it until AROS gets its ass out of the Alpha stage.

That's hardly a sh!t load...

Thing is like CommodoreJohn said there isn't much info to be found on the net about it, last stuff I ever read about it was around 2003 on the monthly CD Magazine "100% Amiga", But it's was mostly stuff about it being in trouble and heading for the realms of the land that time forgot...

Anywhere on the net where folk can find more info about it and see just how far it was developed before it disappeared..

[cecilia]

Originally Posted by XDelusion

The last time I ran Amithlon, it ran circles around any emulator on the same hardware. I loved it!

It was beautiful to behold!

I was lucky enough to use one for a demonstration of IFX at an east coast Amiga Convention. I was amazed at how FAST it was! I may not be into speed the way the boys are, but a faster system does make work that much easier.
I know !

Once I had my hands on one this is what opened my eyes to the possibility of getting some kind of portable Amiga. And after Amithlon had it's political problems (arg), I decided to try WinUAE on a regular windows laptop. I did this by buying a Dell, and eventually making it multiboot with Red Hat. So, I had three OS's on it.

worked very well for years.

Amiga OS faster is really really good

[J-Golden]

Originally Posted by cecilia

It was beautiful to behold!

I was lucky enough to use one for a demonstration of IFX at an east coast Amiga Convention. I was amazed at how FAST it was! I may not be into speed the way the boys are, but a faster system does make work that much easier.
I know !

HA HA!!! I bet you were the one demonstrating the show I was talking about! That's too funny!

I even remember the video clip you worked on for the class. It was woman blowing out a match and you did some kinda cool background effect and it rendered superfast!

[cecilia]

Originally Posted by J-Golden

HA HA!!! I bet you were the one demonstrating the show I was talking about! That's too funny!

I even remember the video clip you worked on for the class. It was woman blowing out a match and you did some kinda cool background effect and it rendered superfast!

Baltimore - yes, that was probably me!

and I had JUST been handed this laptop, so all I had to know was IFX. I think connecting the laptop to the projector was more 'time consuming' only because it wasn't my laptop and I had not done this before. I was VERY impressed.

After that experience I laugh at people who don't appreciate the value of emulation.

[Lando]

Amithlon wasn't so much an Amiga emulator as it didn't actually emulate an Amiga (ie. the custom chips, which to me were what makes an Amiga what it was). Rather it was a way of running Amiga OS 3.x on a x86 machine on top of a barebones linux kernel.

I torrented it several years ago to try out (it wasn't available to buy anymore) and it was very fast. In UAE the customer chip emulation takes 90% of the processor time so the reason Amithlon was so fast is because it didn't bother with any of that, but you had to run hardware-banging apps in E-UAE on top of Amithlon which kinda negated the whole point.

[rdolores]

I used Amithlon quite extensively several years before moving to AROS. It's pretty slick. I got it to work on several PIII machines from 800 MHz to 1 GHz. Got the video, audio, NIC and even USB working. My old Amiga Productivity Tools worked well, like ProWrite. And I was able to connect it to my home network which was cool. However, I gave up on it because at the time it had issues with P4 CPU's. Perhaps the new Kernal will fix that. Will have to try that.

I like AROS, because the install is very easy compared to Amithlon. Also, lately there has been a lot of development going on with it. Haiku hasn't had an update since May 10, 2010. AROS has several since that time. It also had multiple distributions, Icaros Desktop and Broadway. I've got it working on a Dell GX280 3.2 GHz HT CPU.

I have a spare Amithlon machine that I would like to give away to anyone who can pick it up. I'm in the Washington, DC area. It's dual boot with Windows XP. In XP mode, its a dog. But booting it into Amithlon, it flies. It's good for fooling around with.