|
Register or have you forgotten your password?
|
|
|
| Amiga Software Issues and Discussion This forum exists for the discussion of the use, issues with, and fun brought about by classic and next generation Amiga software. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | ||||||||
|
Cult Member
![]()
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: France
Posts: 772
|
Hi All,
I recently got corrupt archives so I am fearing to have a lot more corrupted files on my HD. So in order to check the integrity of all archives, do you know a good (and maybe fast) program to do the job ? Lio |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||||||||
|
Cult Member
![]()
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: France
Posts: 772
|
no good testing programs then ?
Lio |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||||||||
|
Cult Member
![]()
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 615
|
You could try doing something like this, from the
root directory of your hard drive: lzx -r t #? which will test all the archives with an lzx or lha suffix. The -r option makes the program enter all the subdirectories. A note of warning: I've read from the faq of lzx - http://xavprods.free.fr/lzx/index.html - the following warning: "The versions for 68020 and 68040 are not so reliable when you want to archive a lot of small files: you may have corrupted datas in the archive. But LZX won't report the bug during the archiving operation. It will report the bug in the test, or on an extraction operation. Solution : use the 68000 version to archive your files if the 020 or 040 don't work." So it looks like 0x0 versions have this major bug, making these versions unreliable!! :-o Varthall |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||||||||
|
Cult Member
![]()
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: France
Posts: 772
|
thanks, I knew about the existance of the test argument of archivers. Problem is I have a lot of files (dms, zip, lha, lzx) in a lot of directories and dont want to check each file manually. I found on aminet checkX but it can not handle zip files. At the moment I am having serious problems with archives : download and test them is ok but transferring them to a zip disk then on my amiga and test them again, they are corrupted. Funny thing is that if I copy them within the WB (3.9) archives are ok, but within dopus magellan, I got corrupted files !??
Lio |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||||||||||
|
Cult Member
![]()
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 615
|
Quote:
Quote:
Varthall |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||||||||
|
Too much caffeine
![]()
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 96
|
What tools or modules are you using to unpack with DOpus?
If you're using XADopus.module this could be the problem. I've found that it has serious issues handling archives that contain files with names that are too long ( >32 chars ). |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||||||||
|
Cult Member
![]()
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: France
Posts: 772
|
Indeed I use xadopus ! But archives are usually below 32 char. but files inside are often longer. Anyway it is a long time I have bugs since switching to xadopus but dont know exactly how to remove/replace it. Each time I do a parent on a lister, I am always redirected at the top of the lister (quite annoying when you were at letter x).
Lio PS : unarchiver is the same since the patch is C: |
||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| testing , prog , good , archives |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Good sequencing prog for Amiga? | Megaball | Amiga Desktop Audio and Video | 22 | 07-11-2008 11:06 PM |
| Req: Archiving prog with gui... | keropi | Amiga Software Issues and Discussion | 11 | 12-09-2005 05:30 AM |
| Self-Extracting Archives | gizz72 | Amiga Software Issues and Discussion | 1 | 11-11-2004 05:35 PM |
| ADF archives | Red_Eye | Amiga Software Issues and Discussion | 7 | 09-03-2003 06:19 PM |
| corrupt zip archives | lionstorm | Amiga Software Issues and Discussion | 8 | 08-11-2003 10:26 AM |