The Olsen twins have turned 18!!

[iamaboringperson]

Whoopee!! (http://channels.netscape.com/ns/celebrity/gallery_fr.jsp?floc=ce-othr-0-0-g-olsens3&gname=olsens3) :juggler: :love: :insane: :mickeymouse: :banana: :knuddel: :kitty: :pint:
(yay)

[whabang]

What's so special about that?
Besides, they're too skinny anyways.

[bloodline]

Is it me.. or do those two have a striking resemblence to Mini-Me?

[sumner7]

:lol:

I don't really like the olsen twins that much anyway. They just want fame! Anyone can do what they've done! I don't think they're that attractive either.

[redrumloa]

Howard Stern must be happy:-) They were cute kids and I guess people figured they'd blossom into some sex godesses. I dunno about you but at 18 they still look too much like children to me, and too mousey looking. Maybe they're just late bloomers.

Actually considering their fame nowadays seem to hold on by a thread, making B-movies that don't do very well, I'd be willing to bet they are just about washed up. They aren't cute little children anymore and they aren't exactly sex symbols. Makes you wonder how far they will fall, if this is really the case.

[whabang]

I dunno about you but at 18 they still look too much like children to me, and too mousey looking.
Ohh, I forgot that 18 is when american girls get legal! :oops:
Now I understand what this post is about! :lol:

[MAD]

Hoya!

Why? Is it 12 in Sweden? ;-)

Be funky

M A D

[whabang]

Fifteen, actually.

[cecilia]

redrumloa wrote:
Howard Stern must be happy:-) They were cute kids and I guess people figured they'd blossom into some sex godesses. actually, he mentioned that as they didn't turn into these sex goddesses, so no one is interested in them anymore. (i'm paraphrasing. howard has three daughters, so he has no sexual interest in very young girls.)

Actually considering their fame nowadays seem to hold on by a thread, making B-movies that don't do very well, I'd be willing to bet they are just about washed up. They aren't cute little children anymore and they aren't exactly sex symbols. Makes you wonder how far they will fall, if this is really the case. i always thought they were ugly children and they are now talentless, unattractive gnomes.

[Vincent]

cecilia wrote:
i always thought they were ugly children and they are now talentless, unattractive gnomes.
Hey! No need to insult gnomes! :-P

[KennyR]

Great! Now it's legal for them to drink themselves to death!

:banana: :banana:

:-P

[redrumloa]

Ohh, I forgot that 18 is when american girls get legal! :oops:


In most states, yes it is 18. It is regulated by the state though. IIRC South Carolina is the lowest at 14 with some states at 15-17, but the majority are 18.

[redrumloa]

KennyR wrote:
Great! Now it's legal for them to drink themselves to death!


Actually no. Drinking age is federally regulated at 21. They can smoke cigarettes and if they were boys they could be drafted at 18.

[MAD]

Hoya!

@redrumloa

14!!??!!! Wow!

"Be careful America, or you are going to tunr into some European pinko-punk country!" :-P

Seriously, I think 18 is a sensible age.

Be funky

M A D

[Speelgoedmannetje]

geez, bunch o' paedo's :-P

[that_punk_guy]

No no, it's "ephebophiles." I've been reading, ha ha! :-D

[KennyR]

Redrumload wrote:
Actually no. Drinking age is federally regulated at 21. They can smoke cigarettes and if they were boys they could be drafted at 18.

Heh, weird. So they can have rampant and unbridled sex with either gender, own a gun, chain smoke, and legally murder other human beings, but aren't allowed a beer afterwards.

[QuikSanz]

@ iamaboringperson,

I remember from the news that some boy found a 2 headed snake back east somewhere not to long ago and named it, Mary Kate and Ashley

Chris

[redrumloa]

KennyR wrote:
[quote]Redrumload wrote:


Tsk tsk.

[whabang]

KennyR wrote:
Redrumload wrote:
Actually no. Drinking age is federally regulated at 21. They can smoke cigarettes and if they were boys they could be drafted at 18.

Heh, weird. So they can have rampant and unbridled sex with either gender, own a gun, chain smoke, and legally murder other human beings, but aren't allowed a beer afterwards.
Hehe! We have the same thing here:
You can have sex when you're fifteen. When you're eighteen you can vote, you can get drafted, you can smoke, you can go out drinking in bars, etc. You can't buy anything in a liquor store until you're twenty, though. :roll:

[Methuselas]

redrumloa wrote:

...if they were boys they could be drafted at 18.


Well....if Bush is re-elected, there have been rumors and many quotes referencing them changing the draft to include women next year. :-( There is even talk of mandatory draft after graduation.

Personally, I don't care for the Olsen twins. I couldn't stand Full House as a show and if I remember correctly, they're worth 300 million. Hopefully those two were smart enough to invest in other, profitable businesses.

Dirty, old men probably care more than anyone else. :lol:

[iamaboringperson]

Expect to see more of them soon! ;)

:-P :-P :-P :-P :-P :-P :-P




Seriously, they're not my sort, and they do look a bit young.




My, don't they have awfully large heads in comparrison to their bodies. And largeish eyes in comparison to their heads! ;-)

[KennyR]

Tsk tsk.

Sorry, typo (too much C64 playing on frodo)

Redrumload"*",8,1

;-)

[Glaucus]

heh, they're only 18 but they already look like they've been around the block a few times!

- Mike

[Glaucus]

In most states, yes it is 18. It is regulated by the state though. IIRC South Carolina is the lowest at 14 with some states at 15-17, but the majority are 18.Hmmm.... I take it your're not talking about the legal drinking age.... ;-)

- Mike

[iamaboringperson]

Glaucus wrote:
In most states, yes it is 18. It is regulated by the state though. IIRC South Carolina is the lowest at 14 with some states at 15-17, but the majority are 18.Hmmm.... I take it your're not talking about the legal drinking age.... ;-)

- Mike :whack:

[graffias79]

Just wait and I bet you will see them in porn movies with drug addictions.

[MaDDuck]

Hmmmm........
Like every lecher here, I'm waiting for their collective pseudo-carears to degenerate into pornography!

Take the back door into the full house!
or.
two pairs beat a full house, etc....

[mikeymike]

Like every lecher here, I'm waiting for their collective pseudo-carears to degenerate into pornography!

They'll probably go for the closest thing - pop music.

[T_Bone]

They should retire. Why the hell not? Once you have enough to live on, what's the point? Life becomes a whole lot better when you retire, and if you do it THAT young, I'm sure it's even more so.

[mikeymike]

T_Bone wrote:
They should retire. Why the hell not? Once you have enough to live on, what's the point? Life becomes a whole lot better when you retire, and if you do it THAT young, I'm sure it's even more so.

Have you worked out how much money you'd need to live possibly another 60 years or more? :-)

[T_Bone]

mikeymike wrote:
T_Bone wrote:
They should retire. Why the hell not? Once you have enough to live on, what's the point? Life becomes a whole lot better when you retire, and if you do it THAT young, I'm sure it's even more so.

Have you worked out how much money you'd need to live possibly another 60 years or more? :-)


As long as you keep it invested, the longer the better :-D

It only takes about 30 years worth to become perpetual. If you have enough to last 30 years, you have enough forever, barring some catastrophic market crash.
(Even then... Real Estate is pretty safe)

[mjohnson]

@MaDDuck

Hmmmm........
Like every lecher here, I'm waiting for their collective pseudo-carears to degenerate into pornography!
Ehum...yeeah..

You and "47-year-old machinist John Whipple" (http://www.bobfromaccounting.com/1_18_02/olsentwinsarticle.html) both.

:-P


(note: semi-offensive article from Bob from Accounting at other end of link)

[Cyberus]

whabang wrote:
Fifteen, actually.

DAMN!!!

So that beaUtiful and err, 'well-developed' Swedish girl in the bikini who kept giving me the eye and who was staying at my hotel in Barbados would be LEGAL!!! {bleep}!

It might be legally acceptable, but would it be *socially* acceptable? Like, would her parents have minded if we'd got it together? Her being about 16-17 and me 25! :-o

[Cyberus]

mjohnson wrote:
@MaDDuck

Hmmmm........
Like every lecher here, I'm waiting for their collective pseudo-carears to degenerate into pornography!
Ehum...yeeah..

You and "47-year-old machinist John Whipple" (http://www.bobfromaccounting.com/1_18_02/olsentwinsarticle.html) both.

:-P


(note: semi-offensive article from Bob from Accounting at other end of link)

F'ing Hell!!!

[whabang]

@Cyberus
That would probably be a borderline case, and up to the parents in that matter.

I got together with my gf, who was 21 at the time, when I was barely 17. I have a 24 year-old friend, who is seeing a girl that he met when she was 17. No complaints from parents there.

It basically depends on your ethnical background, and wether you have a well-paid job or not :\ (I am
so going to get flamed for that! :-P).

[Cyberus]

whabang wrote:
@Cyberus
That would probably be a borderline case, and up to the parents in that matter.

I got together with my gf, who was 21 at the time, when I was barely 17. I have a 24 year-old friend, who is seeing a girl that he met when she was 17. No complaints from parents there.

It basically depends on your ethnical background, and wether you have a well-paid job or not :\ (I am
so going to get flamed for that! :-P).


I thought I was gonna get flamed for what I said...

[whabang]

Let me put it this way:

I wouldn't lift any eyebrows if a 25 year-old guy dates a 17 year-old girl, neither would anyone that I know.
I can't speak for the entire nation, though, and you'd surely be looked upon as a perv, if you'd keep jumping from girl to girl.

I know a girl who got child with a 38 year-old guy when she was 19. That is extreme. :-)

[KennyR]

Cyberus wrote:
It might be legally acceptable, but would it be *socially* acceptable? Like, would her parents have minded if we'd got it together? Her being about 16-17 and me 25!

No big deal, I think. There's a magical limit of 29 to dating 17+ teens where it stays acceptable. Parents are more relaxed about older boyfriends too, because they're a bit less wild and less likely to knock up their daughter and dump her. In theory. :) No point in dating them so young though - you'd never keep 'em.

[whabang]

True!
Besides,
Older women are more experienced, more sure of themselves, and they mostly know what they want (me usually :-P).

[iamaboringperson]

Not this thread!

Who brought this up? PUKE!

[KennyR]

Who brought this up?

You did, lusting after jailbait.

[iamaboringperson]

KennyR wrote:
Who brought this up?

You did, lusting after jailbait.You're sick.

[KennyR]

Think that would stand up to a vote?

Ok, Amiga.orgers, who is the sickest, KennyR or iamaboringperson?

[Cyberus]

:lol:

[T_Bone]

KennyR wrote:
Think that would stand up to a vote?

Ok, Amiga.orgers, who is the sickest, KennyR or iamaboringperson?

Do politics count? ;-)

[mjohnson]

@KennyR

Ok, Amiga.orgers, who is the sickest, KennyR or iamaboringperson?
Whoever refers to himself in third person? :-P

[Turambar]

On a completely unrelated note, why the hell are the olsen twins in CH/Entertainment?

[cecilia]

Turambar wrote:
On a completely unrelated note, why the hell are the olsen twins in CH/Entertainment?exactly! they were NEVER entertaining.
i'll never understand why anyone even looks at them.

[Speelgoedmannetje]

mjohnson wrote:
@KennyR

Ok, Amiga.orgers, who is the sickest, KennyR or iamaboringperson?
Whoever refers to himself in third person? :-PThat's typically an aspect of a severe case of Autism :lol:

[KennyR]

"Speelgoedmannetje want lollypop...give Speelgoedmannetje lollypop!"

[Cyberus]

:roflmao:

[Speelgoedmannetje]

Yum! A lollypop!