View Full Version : Athlon xp 2600+
shIva
08-22-2002, 09:50 AM
Referring to www.heise.de amd released the new Athlon xp 2600+ with a clockspeed of 2.133 GHz. might be a cool acceleration for Amithlon systems.
The amd (www.amd.com) homepage is not yet updated. will follow soon.
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/data/ciw-21.08.02-000/aufmacher.jpg
source : heise.de (http://www.heise.de/newsticker/data/ciw-21.08.02-000/) (sorry : german language)
DaveP
08-22-2002, 09:52 AM
Gimme gimme!
Orgin
08-22-2002, 09:54 AM
http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/02q3/020821/index.html
For some information in English.
/Björn
whabang
08-22-2002, 10:45 AM
I like!
Allen
08-22-2002, 10:51 AM
bugger. There's me just having bought an 1800!
Allen
whabang
08-22-2002, 10:56 AM
bugger. There's me just having bought an 1800!
LOL! :-D
I feel your pain. When I bought my current Athlon system Slot A was state-of the-art. I had to be certain that I would have a clear upgrade path.
Two days later AMD announced that they were ditching Slot A in favour of Socket A... :-(
redrumloa
08-22-2002, 10:59 AM
I feel your pain. When I bought my current Athlon system Slot A was state-of the-art.
Hehe it always happens. When I built this system (Thunderbird 850 OC to 980), it was the bees knees. Now it is old hat! :-x
bhoggett
08-22-2002, 12:07 PM
Hehe it always happens. When I built this system (Thunderbird 850 OC to 980), it was the bees knees. Now it is old hat!
Same here. My 1.4GHz Thunderbird system with a 64MB GeForce2 GTS and 512 MB DDR memory was the bees' knees when I built it last year, and now it's barely mid-range - although only WindowsXP is causing me performance problems; Linux, BeOS, QNX and Amithlon all perform beatifully.
I'll probably be looking to build a new system around Christmas or the new year, when the new-gen graphics cards come out and the CPUs will probably get upgraded again too.
With any luck, the whole sorry Amithlon saga will have been sorted by then.
:-( :-( :-(
Allen
08-22-2002, 01:22 PM
Always the way eh!?
In some ways I liked the Amiga way...i.e. no new hardware so I could not get sucked into the upgrade cycle of evil!! :-)
Allen
Kronos
08-22-2002, 02:34 PM
Why upgrade ?
I went from K5/166 to K6/233 and to K6-3/400 on the same board,
but it didn't get really faster, just a bit less slow :-o
K6 to AthlonXP1600, that was the boost, and the next x86 I'm
gone buy will be one of the new 64bits with atleast double
performance.
Allen
08-22-2002, 04:06 PM
"Why upgrade ?"
Err? WTF? Are you suggesting downgrading? :-)
Allen
Kronos
08-22-2002, 04:08 PM
@Allen
Nah just stay where you are until you got all the life possible
out of the beast ...
But then, "downgrading" to an C=-One doesn't sound that bad :-D
redrumloa
08-22-2002, 08:00 PM
But then, "downgrading" to an C=-One doesn't sound that bad
Damn right!
Of course you're probably pissed there is no MorphmodoreOne:-P
jk
Kronos
08-22-2002, 08:05 PM
@red
Nah that one is called "Red Bull" ......
... hmmm or was that "Flying Horse" ????
:-D
KennyR
08-22-2002, 09:28 PM
Fast? I don't care if it was 5GHz, was the size of a fingernail, didn't create any heat and was sold for two cents a chip: if it can't run OS4 its useless :-D
Hammer
08-23-2002, 03:28 AM
Nice to see AMD’s new flagchip completing with Intel’s latest flagchip again.
Hammer
08-23-2002, 03:32 AM
the next x86 I'm gone buy will be one of the new 64bits with atleast double performance.
Same here…
DaveP
08-23-2002, 08:20 AM
Which wont be compatible with IA32 and just going
64 bits doesnt mean double the performance.
@Kronos
You mean flying pig?
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.